Proudly Serving New Jersey + Beyond

Available 24/7 | Consultation is Free

Firm Logo
856-393-6073

New Jersey Supreme Court Rules: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Cell Phone Location

On July 18, 2013, The Supreme Court of New Jersey held in State v. Earls (14-1-0706) that Article I, Paragraph 7 of the New Jersey Constitution protects a citizen’s privacy interest in the location of his or her cell phone. Police must obtain a warrant based on a showing of probable cause, or qualify for an exception to the warrant requirement, to obtain tracking information through the use of a cell phone.

A basic cell phone operates like a scanning radio and contacts the nearest cell site towers every seven seconds. Cell phones can be tracked so long as they are not turned off. With advances in technology, cell-phone providers today can pinpoint the location of a person’s cell phone with increasing accuracy.

The Court held that there is a reasonable expectation of privacy, and that cell phones are not meant to serve as tracking devices to locate their owners wherever they may be. Without a warrant, law enforcement in New Jersey will not be able to obtain information regarding the location of a citizen’s cell phone. Should you have questions about this area of the law, please contact attorney, Michael Mormando, at the law firm of Attorneys Hartman, Chartered.

Accent
Accent
Firm Logo
Moorestown Office68 E. Main StreetMoorestown, NJ 08057
Fax: 856.273.8617
Map + Directions
Moorestown Office68 E. Main StreetMoorestown, NJ 08057
Fax: 856.273.8617
Map + Directions